The Government Awarded $1.2 Trillion in Grants. It Still Cannot Count the Workforce Managing Them.

The federal government obligated approximately $1.2 trillion in grants to tribal, state, local and territorial governments in fiscal 2024. It can report that spending to the dollar. It cannot produce an equally complete count of the federal employees who design, award, monitor and close those grants.

The government has a dedicated Grants Management occupational series, GS-1109. FederalHiringData found 3,042 covered employees in that series in June 2026. But the number is a floor, not the workforce. Program specialists, accountants, budget analysts, financial-administration employees, attorneys and subject-matter experts also manage grants, often without an 1109 title.

That measurement gap has persisted for more than a decade. In 2013, the Government Accountability Office found more than 5,100 employees significantly involved in grants at just four selected departments, spread across more than 50 occupational series. More than half of the 22 grantmaking agencies it surveyed made limited or no use of the then-new 1109 classification.

The central finding is not that the government has only 3,042 people overseeing $1.2 trillion. It is that the one clean national occupation count excludes much of the work, making workforce planning, training and workload comparisons harder than the spending total suggests.

The grant total is precise; the workforce denominator is not

The Government Accountability Office reported that 40 federal agencies obligated grants to tribal, state, local and territorial governments in fiscal 2024. The Council on Federal Financial Assistance represented 38 of them and more than 99% of the relevant funding.

Grant programs are not uniform financial transactions. Each begins with authorizing law and may carry agency-specific rules, eligibility, cost sharing, reporting and performance requirements. Federal employees design notices, review applications, negotiate awards, monitor recipients, process amendments, assess performance and close awards.

Some agencies divide those functions between grants management specialists and program staff with subject-matter expertise. Others rely more heavily on program specialists across the life cycle. A job title can therefore describe similar work differently across agencies.

Dividing $1.2 trillion by the 1109 headcount would produce an arresting number, but not a defensible workload measure. Grant dollars vary greatly in administrative complexity, and the denominator omits many workers. At most, such a ratio can show how dangerous an incomplete count would be.

GS-1109 captured only part of the workforce from the start

OPM created the Grants Management series in 2010 to classify work involving federal assistance. By 2012, GAO identified about 1,414 1109 specialists across 22 surveyed CFO Act agencies. Adoption was uneven, and some major grantmakers used program specialists instead.

GAO's 2013 review examined Education, Health and Human Services, State and Transportation. Officials identified more than 5,100 employees significantly involved in grants across over 50 job series. The scale of the non-1109 workforce was not a technical footnote; it was larger than the government-wide 1109 count GAO had assembled for the prior year.

The pattern remained visible in 2018. HHS reported 739 grants specialists and 1,851 other employees in its grants workforce. Agriculture reported 317 grants specialists and 5,508 others. Education reported 545 grants specialists and no separate non-1109 group under its model.

These are agency-reported snapshots under different internal methods, not directly additive national estimates. They demonstrate why series 1109 cannot be treated as a census.

The dedicated occupation grew, then contracted

FederalHiringData's calculation from OPM monthly employment files shows covered GS-1109 employment rising from 1,723 in January 2015 to 4,235 in December 2024. By June 2026, it had fallen to 3,042, a decline of 1,193 employees, or 28.2%, from the 2024 year-end level.

The long expansion likely reflects both workforce growth and greater adoption of the occupation. An employee reclassified into 1109 can raise the series without adding a person to the broader grants workforce. The recent contraction may reflect separations, reorganization or classification changes. The OPM series alone cannot allocate the causes.

What it does establish is that the most identifiable part of the grants workforce was substantially smaller in June 2026 than 18 months earlier. Whether non-1109 grant staff changed at the same rate is unknown because there is no complete common identifier.

That is exactly the planning weakness. When agencies cannot readily count everyone performing grants work, government-wide leaders cannot see whether capacity fell in the same places where obligations and oversight demands remained high.

Recruiting activity peaked before the workforce decline

The FederalHiringData historical USAJOBS archive contains 4,254 distinct GS-1109 announcements opened from March 2017 through Aug. 14, 2026. Annual announcements rose from 118 in partial 2017 coverage to 860 in 2023 and 788 in 2024. The archive contains 66 in 2025 and 45 in partial 2026 coverage.

Announcements are not hires. A single posting may cover multiple grades, locations or vacancies. Standing registers can produce many selections from one control number, while repeated notices may generate no hire. The archive is useful as a recruiting signal and a source for agency, grade, location, pay and workplace terms.

The recent drop in distinct announcements aligns with the OPM-covered decline but does not explain it. Hiring restrictions, changed announcement design and reduced recruiting demand can all lower control-number counts. Accessions and separations are needed to identify the flow.

The archive captures only jobs explicitly coded 1109 for this analysis. A program specialist managing grant performance may appear in series 0301 or another occupation and is intentionally absent.

Training has followed the same definition problem

A professional workforce needs shared competencies as well as a count. GAO found agencies using different training programs and role definitions. Some tailored competencies for grants management specialists; others built separate models for program staff.

The government developed a Financial Assistance Management Career Roadmap and basic Grants Training 101 modules. GAO later found limited awareness and inconsistent use. Its recommendations pushed OMB and agencies to identify broader grants workforces, monitor training and collect feedback.

Some agencies improved. HHS developed a central learner database, and Agriculture identified approximately 8,000 to 9,000 employees across 1109, financial and other series for required training. That broader inventory was useful precisely because it did not assume occupation code alone defined the workforce.

Federal acquisition offers a contrast. Contracting has a more established framework of certification and warranted authority, though it has its own staffing and capacity problems. Grants management has professional tools, but government-wide certification efforts did not develop in the same way.

The new council coordinates policy, not a workforce census

OMB established the Council on Federal Financial Assistance in 2023. Each member agency designated a Senior Financial Assistance Officer to serve as a point of contact. The council helped agencies interpret revised Uniform Guidance and share implementation lessons.

That coordination is significant. It gives 38 grantmaking agencies representing more than 99% of fiscal 2024 obligations a forum for common questions. It does not, by itself, identify every employee doing grants work.

The council could make that problem tractable by establishing a cross-agency workforce-data standard that supplements occupational series. Agencies could identify employees who spend a material share of time on design, award, monitoring, audit resolution or closeout, while preserving distinctions among roles.

A useful standard would not force every agency into the same operating model. It would create comparable fields for role, program phase, certification or training, workload and organizational placement. That would allow government-wide leaders to see capacity without erasing program differences.

What an honest grants-workforce dashboard would show

The first layer would report GS-1109 headcount, accessions, separations, grade, tenure and agency. The second would report other employees assigned material grants duties, identified through a common role flag rather than job title. The third would connect workforce capacity to portfolios without pretending dollars alone equal workload.

Portfolio measures could include number and type of awards, active recipients, amendments, monitoring plans, audit findings and closeout age. A billion-dollar formula grant is not administratively equivalent to thousands of discretionary awards. Ratios need program context.

The dashboard should also disclose the effects of 2025 and 2026 workforce changes in grant-heavy agencies. A government-wide 1109 decline can be concentrated or diffuse. Public data should identify which agencies lost specialists and whether program staff absorbed the work.

For job seekers, grants management offers a direct professional series plus adjacent program and financial roles. Historical postings are not current vacancies. Readers can browse current jobs, explore occupations and compare agency hiring.

Related research

Put this finding in context

All articles

Data investigations/August 18, 2026

FEMA's Public Workforce Count Fell 22% as GAO Warned of Readiness Risks

FEMA had 5,793 fewer covered civilian employees in June 2026 than in January 2025. GAO says the agency cut staff without the workforce planning needed to assess mission capacity.

Data investigations/August 19, 2026

The Federal Workforce Shrunk by 286,000. DOGE's Savings Are Harder to Prove

FederalHiringData finds a 12.4% workforce contraction and an estimated $22.8 billion decline in annualized basic-pay cost, while the public savings ledger remains incomplete.

The government has made its grant spending increasingly visible. Workforce stewardship should receive the same treatment. Until agencies can count the people responsible for the full award life cycle, $1.2 trillion will remain easier to total than the capacity protecting it.

Agency adoption changes what the national series means

Growth in GS-1109 can reflect two different events: an agency hired more grants specialists, or it reclassified existing work into the dedicated occupation. Both may improve professional identity, but only the first adds headcount. A government-wide time series needs agency-level adoption history to distinguish them.

Education's 2018 model illustrates high adoption. It reported 545 grants specialists and no separate non-1109 workforce in the GAO table. HHS and Agriculture reported thousands of employees outside 1109. Comparing their 1109 counts without those operating models would make Education appear unusually grants-intensive and Agriculture unusually lean, even though Agriculture identified a far larger broader workforce.

Agency-specific program law also shapes the role. A scientific grant may require peer review and technical monitoring. A formula grant may rely more heavily on eligibility, financial reporting and audit resolution. Emergency assistance can create rapid award and oversight work. One generic staffing ratio cannot absorb those differences.

The solution is not to force every participant into GS-1109. Program specialists need subject-matter careers, and financial staff may manage grants alongside other duties. A supplemental grants-role identifier would count the work while preserving occupation.

$1.2 trillion is not one homogeneous portfolio

The fiscal 2024 total covers awards to multiple levels of government and a wide range of purposes. A small number of large transfers can dominate dollars, while a program with lower obligations can require intensive review across many recipients.

Workload measures should therefore include active awards, recipients, applications, amendments, monitoring actions, audit findings and closeouts. Agencies can then explain which elements drive staffing. Dollars are important exposure, but they are not hours of work.

Closeout is an especially useful capacity signal because unfinished administrative work can persist after program performance ends. Aging closeouts may indicate documentation issues, recipient delays, system limitations or insufficient staff. Connecting them to workforce data would reveal where capacity problems occur in the award life cycle.

The Council on Federal Financial Assistance is well placed to standardize these fields because it already connects nearly all grant funding. A consistent role and workload vocabulary would make its coordination visible in data as well as guidance.

A government-wide standard should also document confidence and coverage. Agencies could disclose which components reported, what share of employee time qualified as grants work and whether contractors were counted. That would avoid turning a better estimate into a falsely precise census.

Standardization would make long-run comparison possible. The current 1109 series can show one occupation, but a role-based supplement could reveal whether professionalization actually expanded capacity or merely moved employees among classifications.

Methodology and limitations

Fiscal 2024 obligations and Council on Federal Financial Assistance coverage come from GAO-26-108283. Historical workforce-definition findings come from GAO-13-591 and GAO-18-491. Agency-reported workforce figures retain the methods and dates in those reviews and are not combined into a national estimate.

FederalHiringData calculated monthly covered GS-1109 employment from OPM Federal Workforce Data from January 2015 through June 2026. Series 1109 is explicitly treated as a partial count. We counted distinct historical USAJOBS control numbers coded to GS-1109 from March 2, 2017 through Aug. 14, 2026. Announcements are not vacancies filled or employees hired, and 2026 coverage is partial.

This article does not calculate grant dollars per worker because the defensible broader workforce denominator is unknown. Readers can browse current federal jobs, review federal statistics, explore occupational series and read more data investigations.